Influence of Lumped Grounding Electrode Geometry on Its Impulse Resistance at High Electric Field Strength in Soil: A Comparative Study

Authors

  • Viktor V. IVONIN
  • Aleksey S. KARPOV
  • Anton A. BRIN’

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24160/0013-5380-2026-4-12-17

Keywords:

lightning protection, lumped grounding electrode, impulse grounding resistance, soil ionization, spark discharge, impulse voltage generator

Abstract

The article presents the results of a comparative experimental study of the effect the lumped grounding electrode geometry has on its impulse resistance for the regularities linking the electrode shape with the dynamics of the nonlinear transient during impulse breakdown. The studies were carried out under the conditions of intensely ionized soil having high resistivity. Three types of electrodes with equal surface area were tested under field conditions: a horizontal rod, a horizontal pipe, and a hemispherical electrode. The impact was produced by high-voltage impulses with an amplitude of up to 300 kV. Using the method of synchronous oscillographic recording of voltage and current, time dependencies of impulse resistance were obtained. It has been determined that the electrode geometry has a systematic effect on both the absolute value of the minimum impulse resistance and the coefficient of its reduction relative to the stationary value. The rod electrode provides the lowest absolute impulse resistance at all values of the impulse applied, thereby confirming its practical advantages as a means for lightning protection of power industry facilities. The hemispherical electrode demonstrates the maximum relative ionization efficiency, indicating the highest resistance reduction dynamics for this geometry. The data obtained serve as a basis for refining mathematical models describing a nonlinear current spreading pattern, which take into account the influence of geometry on the spatial development of spark channels in soil.

Author Biographies

Viktor V. IVONIN

(Northern Energetics Research Centre – Branch of the Federal Research Centre “Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences”, Apatity, Russia) – Researcher

Aleksey S. KARPOV

(Northern Energetics Research Centre – Branch of the Federal Research Centre “Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences”, Apatity, Russia) – Chief, Cand. Sci. (Eng.).

Anton A. BRIN’

(Institute of Energy National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus) – Chief, Cand. Sci. (Phys.-Math.).

References

1. Бургсдорф В.В., Якобс А.И. Заземляющие устройства электроустановок. М.: Энергоатомиздат, 1987, 400 с.

2. Рябкова Е.Я. Заземления в установках высокого напряжения. М.: Энергия, 1978, 224 с.

3. Правила устройства электроустановок. Седьмое издание. М.: Изд-во НЦ ЭНАС, 2006, 522 с.

4. IEC 62561-2:2018. Lightning protection system components (LPSC). 2018, 66 p.

5. Lightning Protection / Ed. by V. Cooray. London: IET, 2010, 1100 p.

6. Rakov V.A., Uman M.A. Lightning: Physics and Effects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, 687 p.

7. Vasilyak L.M. et al. Nonlinear Impulse Current Spreading and Electrical Breakdown in Soil. – High Temperature, 2014, vol. 52, pp. 797–802, DOI: 10.1134/S0018151X14060182.

8. Nor N.M. Review: Soil Electrical Characteristics Under High Impulse Currents. – IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2006, vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 826–829, DOI: 10.1109/TEMC. 2006.882837.

9. Asimakopoulou F.E., Gonos I.F., Stathopulos I.A. Methodologies for Determination of Soil Ionization Gradient. – Journal of Electrostatics, 2012, vol. 70, No. 5, pp. 457–461, DOI: 10.1016/j.elstat.2012.07.003.

10. Vasilyak L.M. et al. Electrical Breakdown of Soil Under Nonlinear Pulsed Current Spreading. – Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2015, vol. 48, DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/48/28/285201.

11. Ивонин В.В. и др. Оптические исследования искровых каналов в грунте при растекании импульсного тока. – Прикладная физика, 2015, № 4, с. 50–53.

12. Wang J., Liew A.C., Darveniza M. Extension of Dynamic Model of Impulse Behaviour of Concentrated Grounds at High Currents. – IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2005, vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 2160–2165, DOI: 10.1109/TPWRD.2004.839645.

13. Gouda O.E. et al. Performance of Grounding Electrodes Under Lightning Strokes in Uniform and Two-Layer Soils Considering Soil Ionization. – IEEE Access, 2022, vol. 10, pp. 76855–76869, DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3192394.

14. Meyberg R.A., de Barros M.T.C., Mahseredjian J. New Methodology for Representing Soil Ionization in FDTD Simulations of Grounding Electrodes. – IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2025, vol. 67, No. 1, pp. 277–285, DOI: 10.1109/TEMC.2024.3505113.

15. Ивонин В.В. Исследование импульсных сопротивлений электродов различных типов с одинаковой площадью поверхности. – Труды Кольского научного центра РАН, 2018, т. 9, № 8 (17), с. 122–126.

#

1. Burgsdorf V.V., Yakobs A.I. Zazemlyayushchie ustroystva elektroustanovok (Grounding Devices of Electrical Installations). M.: Energoatomizdat, 1987, 400 p.

2. Ryabkova E.Ya. Zazemleniya v ustanovkah vysokogo naprya-zheniya (Grounding in High Voltage Installations). M.: Energiya, 1978, 224 p.

3. Pravila ustroystva elektroustanovok. Sed’moe izdanie (Rules of the Device of Electrical Installations. Seventh Edition). M.: Izd-vo NTs ENAS, 2006, 522 p.

4. IEC 62561-2:2018. Lightning protection system components (LPSC). 2018, 66 p.

5. Lightning Protection / Ed. by V. Cooray. London: IET, 2010, 1100 p.

6. Rakov V.A., Uman M.A. Lightning: Physics and Effects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, 687 p.

7. Vasilyak L.M. et al. Nonlinear Impulse Current Spreading and Electrical Breakdown in Soil. – High Temperature, 2014, vol. 52, pp. 797–802, DOI: 10.1134/S0018151X14060182.

8. Nor N.M. Review: Soil Electrical Characteristics Under High Impulse Currents. – IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2006, vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 826–829, DOI: 10.1109/TEMC.2006.882837.

9. Asimakopoulou F.E., Gonos I.F., Stathopulos I.A. Metho-dologies for Determination of Soil Ionization Gradient. – Journal of Electrostatics, 2012, vol. 70, No. 5, pp. 457–461, DOI: 10.1016/j.elstat.2012.07.003.

10. Vasilyak L.M. et al. Electrical Breakdown of Soil Under Nonlinear Pulsed Current Spreading. – Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2015, vol. 48, DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/48/28/285201.

11. Ivonin V.V. et al. Prikladnaya fizika – in Russ. (Applied Phy-sics), 2015, No. 4, pp. 50–53.

12. Wang J., Liew A.C., Darveniza M. Extension of Dynamic Model of Impulse Behaviour of Concentrated Grounds at High Currents. – IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2005, vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 2160–2165, DOI: 10.1109/TPWRD.2004.839645.

13. Gouda O.E. et al. Performance of Grounding Electrodes Under Lightning Strokes in Uniform and Two-Layer Soils Considering Soil Ionization. – IEEEAccess, 2022, vol. 10, pp. 76855–76869, DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3192394.

14. Meyberg R.A., de Barros M.T.C., Mahseredjian J. New Methodology for Representing Soil Ionization in FDTD Simulations of Grounding Electrodes. – IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2025, vol. 67, No. 1, pp. 277–285, DOI: 10.1109/TEMC.2024.3505113.

15. Ivonin V.V. Trudy Kol’skogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN – in Russ. (Proceedings of the Kola Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences), 2018, vol. 9, No. 8 (17), pp. 122–126

Published

2026-04-11

Issue

Section

Article